<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Exaile &#8211; A Powerful Music Player with Management Capabilities	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.geeksmint.com/exaile-music-player-with-lyrics-tagging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.geeksmint.com/exaile-music-player-with-lyrics-tagging/</link>
	<description>GeeksMint: Computers, How-to&#039;s, Internet, Tips and Tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 10:01:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bernd Wechner		</title>
		<link>https://www.geeksmint.com/exaile-music-player-with-lyrics-tagging/#comment-2676</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bernd Wechner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 11:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.geeksmint.com/?p=6124#comment-2676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice one. I mean I&#039;m still fishing for the ideal music solution so am all ears (mopidy is my current hot favourite). But what your article saliently lacks is an answer to the question on the tip of every reader&#039;s tongue surely? In the Linux world at least, that question is certainly WTFYAMP? Why The F* Yet Another Music Player!

We are in total gridlock and analysis paralysis in deciding which one of the many to use! To wit I hope in any article introducing anew one to address that question ... what is the raison d&#039;etre for this player, what is the underlying ethos of the development team that saw them start a new play rather than go with, well in the Python world, Quod Libet, Lollypop or Mopidy? Do we really need to bathe in options or could we not pool our collective efforts and build the music player to beat all music players?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one. I mean I&#8217;m still fishing for the ideal music solution so am all ears (mopidy is my current hot favourite). But what your article saliently lacks is an answer to the question on the tip of every reader&#8217;s tongue surely? In the Linux world at least, that question is certainly WTFYAMP? Why The F* Yet Another Music Player!</p>
<p>We are in total gridlock and analysis paralysis in deciding which one of the many to use! To wit I hope in any article introducing anew one to address that question &#8230; what is the raison d&#8217;etre for this player, what is the underlying ethos of the development team that saw them start a new play rather than go with, well in the Python world, Quod Libet, Lollypop or Mopidy? Do we really need to bathe in options or could we not pool our collective efforts and build the music player to beat all music players?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
