<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What is the Future of Raspberry Pi After More Than Ten Million Sales	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.geeksmint.com/future-of-raspberry-pi-after-ten-million-sales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.geeksmint.com/future-of-raspberry-pi-after-ten-million-sales/</link>
	<description>GeeksMint: Computers, How-to&#039;s, Internet, Tips and Tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 19:32:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jawnhenry		</title>
		<link>https://www.geeksmint.com/future-of-raspberry-pi-after-ten-million-sales/#comment-3260</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jawnhenry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 19:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.geeksmint.com/?p=1650#comment-3260</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t predict a bright future; according to the Raspberry P i group, the Raspberry had sold in excess of &lt;i&gt;&lt;u&gt;fifteen million units, more than one year ago.&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/i&gt; 
The RPi Group has a long history of playing fast and loose with such insignificant items as specs, design flaws, problems, Gigabit-ethernet-which-isn&#039;t (&quot;Gigabit Ethernet&quot; is a DIRECT QUOTE from the RPi people to ALL news outlets, to describe their crippled &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;300 MHz Ethernet upgrade&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; to their latest product); heat problems which exist for everyone-else-but-them...
The RPi organization can churn out &#039;grandstand&#039; after &#039;grandstand&#039; (a Power-over-Ethernet add-on, for a cheap computer-trainer for 8-year-olds? Give me a break!), but refuses to fix THE problem which has existed since the very first day of the introduction of the very first Raspberry Pi: the fact that the Raspberry Pi has &lt;i&gt;&lt;u&gt;NO&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/i&gt; way to be turned off with a simple &quot;on-off&quot; switch.
Perhaps this &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt; NEGATIVE fifty-percent SWITCH &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; in sales numbers is the Raspberry Pi Trading Group&#039;s concession to the lack of simply designing a simple on-off switch.
Sorry, Raspberry Pi--your puffery is old, and really worn out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t predict a bright future; according to the Raspberry P i group, the Raspberry had sold in excess of <i><u>fifteen million units, more than one year ago.</u></i><br />
The RPi Group has a long history of playing fast and loose with such insignificant items as specs, design flaws, problems, Gigabit-ethernet-which-isn&#8217;t (&#8220;Gigabit Ethernet&#8221; is a DIRECT QUOTE from the RPi people to ALL news outlets, to describe their crippled <i><b><u>300 MHz Ethernet upgrade</u></b></i> to their latest product); heat problems which exist for everyone-else-but-them&#8230;<br />
The RPi organization can churn out &#8216;grandstand&#8217; after &#8216;grandstand&#8217; (a Power-over-Ethernet add-on, for a cheap computer-trainer for 8-year-olds? Give me a break!), but refuses to fix THE problem which has existed since the very first day of the introduction of the very first Raspberry Pi: the fact that the Raspberry Pi has <i><u>NO</u></i> way to be turned off with a simple &#8220;on-off&#8221; switch.<br />
Perhaps this <b><i> NEGATIVE fifty-percent SWITCH </i></b> in sales numbers is the Raspberry Pi Trading Group&#8217;s concession to the lack of simply designing a simple on-off switch.<br />
Sorry, Raspberry Pi&#8211;your puffery is old, and really worn out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
