<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 10 Best Web Browsers You Can Install on Your Raspberry Pi	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.geeksmint.com/web-browsers-for-raspberry-pi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.geeksmint.com/web-browsers-for-raspberry-pi/</link>
	<description>GeeksMint: Computers, How-to&#039;s, Internet, Tips and Tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 23:55:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>https://www.geeksmint.com/web-browsers-for-raspberry-pi/#comment-5827</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 23:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.geeksmint.com/?p=13450#comment-5827</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What you really need.  Is, the ability to save done or all tabs., Done or all bookmarks.  To local memory as a backup and to use on another browser.  The ability to re+arrange all these things.

The ability to design simple websites and through GUI maybe complex through content management system, and all main web languages.  That&#039;s a plug in.

The ability to do email, and feeds, Usenet and notes, and link to bookmarks, with the ability to back up to local storage.  That&#039;s another plug in.  Through it could offer bookmark and tab services too.  For old timers we can identify the plugins to be 1MB of code, or 100MB if you are going diva poor job.  OS&#039;s used to be less than 10MB, even with good integrated object orientated productivity apps, and good gui.  Why we can&#039;t do all these things in 10MB these days is an issue.

However, with all the above and interpolation, the ability to pass and translate all user data into a new system , through common formats, you get an internet power house.  This is closest to what features the old desktop opera with M2 used to have, where you could even use it as a server for a internet space for the course it&#039;s on.  But with a bit more than that.

I suggest we need a 50-100MB package like this with each tab, feature and data sandboxed. With user configurable mobile, and desktop views, where you can start with any of these modes and configure a custom mode with any of these things.  In old opera, I used to be able to control individuals rendering features and look, to get past rendering problem or select desktop or printable view, I think.  It was great, and we have lost it.

Any of these browsers meet these features?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you really need.  Is, the ability to save done or all tabs., Done or all bookmarks.  To local memory as a backup and to use on another browser.  The ability to re+arrange all these things.</p>
<p>The ability to design simple websites and through GUI maybe complex through content management system, and all main web languages.  That&#8217;s a plug in.</p>
<p>The ability to do email, and feeds, Usenet and notes, and link to bookmarks, with the ability to back up to local storage.  That&#8217;s another plug in.  Through it could offer bookmark and tab services too.  For old timers we can identify the plugins to be 1MB of code, or 100MB if you are going diva poor job.  OS&#8217;s used to be less than 10MB, even with good integrated object orientated productivity apps, and good gui.  Why we can&#8217;t do all these things in 10MB these days is an issue.</p>
<p>However, with all the above and interpolation, the ability to pass and translate all user data into a new system , through common formats, you get an internet power house.  This is closest to what features the old desktop opera with M2 used to have, where you could even use it as a server for a internet space for the course it&#8217;s on.  But with a bit more than that.</p>
<p>I suggest we need a 50-100MB package like this with each tab, feature and data sandboxed. With user configurable mobile, and desktop views, where you can start with any of these modes and configure a custom mode with any of these things.  In old opera, I used to be able to control individuals rendering features and look, to get past rendering problem or select desktop or printable view, I think.  It was great, and we have lost it.</p>
<p>Any of these browsers meet these features?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Grimm		</title>
		<link>https://www.geeksmint.com/web-browsers-for-raspberry-pi/#comment-4525</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Grimm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 18:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.geeksmint.com/?p=13450#comment-4525</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The package name for Epiphany is epiphany-browser. If you just install epiphany, you get some 90&#039;s style game that reminds me of Dig Dug without explosives.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The package name for Epiphany is epiphany-browser. If you just install epiphany, you get some 90&#8217;s style game that reminds me of Dig Dug without explosives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
